Quote from: oobabasama on Today at 06:36:03 PM#窓辺ななみ (Nanami Madobe): 320
Quote from: Bella on Today at 07:29:39 PMI wonder what the stats would be like if the entirety of the old gallery was ported over to the booru instance...
Quote from: Goujer on Today at 03:18:14 PMShe is pretty low on the popularity pole here I guess lol
Here's the current gallery post counts above her:
madobe_nanami 330
xp-tan 192
me-tan 157
2k-tan 149
madobe_touko 129
madobe_yuu 128
madobe_ai 126
homeko 124
95-tan 93
oobaba-sama 66
98-tan 63
98se-tan 51
claudia_madobe 44
inu-t 38
ce-tan 34
dos_kitty 33
madobe_mutsumi 33
moseko 33
nt-mama 31
os9-tan 29
saba-tan 25
vistake 25
aizawa_inori 25
mac-tan 24
vulcan_98 23
tiger-tan 22
oichi-san 19
homeo 17
vulcan_98se 17
firefox-ko 15
cheetah-tan 15
leopard-tan_(pink) 14
ruri_azumi 13
ultima-san 13
Quote from: oobabasama on July 06, 2026, 10:48:29 PMIt turns out Ultima-san isn't that obscure after all, she has far more posts on Pixiv than for example Secchan. It reminds me of how Obabasama has far more tagged posts than ME, XP, 95 and everyone else on the same site
Quote from: Bella on July 11, 2026, 07:27:45 PMApple bottom jeans and the boots with the fur...
Quote from: Bella on July 11, 2026, 07:27:45 PMNifty! I don't remember that character (despite having seen the illustration you pulled from) so it's cool to see a new take on her.
Quote from: stewartsage on July 11, 2026, 09:42:34 PMMore stiff flared skirts, wing, things for OS-tans, I say.
Quote from: stewartsage on July 11, 2026, 09:42:34 PM2k-kun wants to talk to me about how I've overspent the club budget and we're still not ready for the school festival.
Quote from: Bella on July 11, 2026, 07:18:16 PMHe looks good!
Quote from: stewartsage on July 11, 2026, 09:31:48 PMHeadband's interesting! I too like the vest, the pocket 5s are neat.Thank you both!

Quote from: stewartsage on July 11, 2026, 09:40:10 PMI think at the time there was talk of an ENIAC-tan being made but it never came to realization so I never filled that out. All-in-all it's not a very filled out concept. Given that I've reworked much more complete concepts, I should probably give CALDIC-tan an overhaul too.
Quote from: VonDaab on Yesterday at 04:03:29 AMIt's really just how in practical use there just wasn't too much software made to utilize Win3.1, unlike later OSs like Win95 that actually started to have software made specifically for launching within windows.Ah, pardon my tone, thought you were saying 3.1 wasn't an OS. There was a lot of software for it but not a lot of games. One fun fact about 3.1 is that the reason it didn't have much of a game industry is because its GDI (the graphics API) was built almost exclusively for drawing productivity software rather than games. WinG actually fixed this issue, and Gabe Newell even ported DOOM to it, but that was in 1994 and Windows 95 released the following year with DirectX so it didn't get much attention.
Do note that I said earlier "how much stuff required launching from DOS" not "everything had to be launched through DOS".
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 19 queries.