Quote from: Bella on Today at 09:39:07 AMMy hot take is not all software personifications are OS-tans but the Madobe are.
I don't know where I draw the line between something being an OS-tan and a non -tan personification, but I think it probably ties into a cute anime girl/boy/person aesthetic, adopting the conventions of the original futaba OS-tans (being a moe anthropomorphism, and memory relating to hunger and breast size for example).
If someone has a 100% original software personification lineup, with its own separate world building & conventions from the original futaba OS-tans, I don't think I would consider those -tan, but personification.
Quote from: oobabasama on Yesterday at 06:04:24 PMThe Madobes are very debatably considered OS-tans, they're more like mascots in opposition to OS-tans who are moe personifications
Quote from: Lily1027 on Yesterday at 08:35:49 AMTHIS!
Actually, the Futaba and Madobe OS-tans are not related to each other, but it seems many people are unaware of it. Considering how many people use term "Saseko Madobe" etc. It kinda feels... off?
However, as I've said before, I think people can decide themselfs what OS-tans they will considers canon or not, which Vista-tan they will use, if they will make their own OS-tans or own universe etc.
However, I don't really like when names like "Saseko Madobe" etc. Are used in something educative about OS-tan, like a wiki etc.
I think it would be much better if people would make custom surnames for Futaba OS-tans. But it probably seems not so many people are into OS-tans as much as am I. So people are probably unaware that Futaba OS-tans and Madobe OS-tans are two separate universes.
Quote from: oobabasama on Yesterday at 04:11:01 AMI hate it when people apply the last name Madobe to the Futaba girls
Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.