Quote from: Bella on October 28, 2025, 01:20:27 PMIt has occurred to me re-reading your SAGE-tan writings how much SAGE & GENIAC-chan parallel Whirlwind and Harvard Mark I-tan. Which is to say, now I'm considering Harvard Mark 1-tan and SAGE-chan interactions.I can't imagine she had the patience to deal with Mark 1-tan as a kid.
Quote from: Bella on October 28, 2025, 01:20:27 PMOn a different note, after I finish up the early "EDVAC family" computer-tans, I would like to rework / polish / finish up the PDP-tans. PDP-1, -8 and -11 are pretty good as-is, but PDP-7, -10 and -12 need work.That's quite the project. There is a lot of DEC hardware you could tackle if you let it get out of control. If you can't find anything really gripping about the industrial ones, don't bother just to check a box.
I may also take a shot at -tanning the predecessors/follow-ups to better known models. PDP-4, -9 and -15 in the PDP-1 family, PDP-5 in the LINC/PDP-8 family, and PDP-6 as PDP-10-tan's older sister ... I'm still on the fence about splitting off DECSYSTEM-20 into its own personification, or rolling it into PDP-10's.
There's also the matter of the industrial controller PDPs (-14 and -16), which don't have a lot of flavor but I would like to tackle for the sake of completionism...
Stew, didn't you say you would design a VAX-tan?
Quote from: C-Chan on November 20, 2007, 11:37:20 AMSAGE-tan strikes me as one of those stereotypical hot-blooded, smart-mouthed, nuclear trigger-happy yet overly-idealistic American generals from the 1950's, with just a touch of "eggheadness" (like the NASA engineers from 'Apollo 13').






Page created in 0.053 seconds with 16 queries.