Which OS-Tan Are You?

Started by NewYinzer, August 02, 2006, 08:17:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20
User actions

GTCD

#240
October 16, 2009, 08:56:23 AM
Objection your honor!

Using this technique, the user ofthe quiz could expect the results, which leads to inaccuracy. In addition, more questions must be made, thus boring the user.

I suggest more questions that specifies to certain, but not one, results.

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#241
October 16, 2009, 03:09:36 PM
This is a quiz, not a riddle. -.-
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

GTCD

#242
October 16, 2009, 03:44:53 PM
You are obviously don't know what I'm talking about.


Ok just for the hell of it.
Example:

Describe yourself:
A pervert
A hot chick
A cross-dressing human

See? We're killing two birds with one stone here lawl. With questions that give more choices means less questions, unexpecting (but precise) results.
But yes, we could usea few questions that specify to a person though.

Dun.

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#243
October 16, 2009, 03:59:10 PM
I'm not even bothering calculating the efficiency rate of that, since I know it'd be quite bothersome to set up; also, the downside of your "unexpectedness" is inaccuracy. If you just make the quiz long enough, you can achieve unexpectedness without losing accuracy.

(Then again, it's a quiz, not expecting some damn oracle here -w-)
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

GTCD

#244
October 16, 2009, 04:08:31 PM
It's just too dam long! LOOK AT THE LIST

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#245
October 16, 2009, 04:12:46 PM
THINK LOGICALLY
It makes perfect sense not to include EVERY single character in a quiz. All OS'es, in one, and then perhaps app-tans and viru/malware-tans in separate versions.

Cluttering = DO NOT WANT
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

GTCD

#246
October 16, 2009, 04:35:49 PM
Then I'll be seeing that updated list, FROM YOU. :D

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#247
October 16, 2009, 05:40:33 PM
Oh, dear ME, what a challenge.

OS-tans, primary list
3.1-tan
NT-san (Big NT, Mama NT, etc)
Inu-T
95-tan
Hacchan (Win98)
Secchan (Win98SE)
ME-tan
2k-tan
XP-tan (XP Pro, "Saseko")
Homeko (XP Home)
Moseko (XPMCE)
Visbou (Ninja Vistan)
Vistake ("Screw" Vistan)
Generic OSX-tan
MacOS9-tan/Sonata
MacOS7.5-tan
Linux-tan (Aka Penguin girl)
OS/2-tan

OS-Tans, secondary list (Secondary -tans or -tans of unreleased os'es)
Komepo (XP Pro secondary OF AMERICA, not sure if we need YET ANOTHER XP-tan)
95 OSR 2.1-tan (System update, kinda like security packs these days, not sure if want)
95 OSR 2.5-tan (Same as above, don't even know the differences between these two)
Yamada (Win98 secondary)
97-tan (Pre-release Win98)
Odyssey-tan (Windows Odyssey, unreleased beta OS
Neptune-tan (Windows Neptune, beta)
Mac OSX "Tiger"-tan (insufficient data)
Mac OSX "Cheetah"-tan (insufficient data, and not sure if we need both of these anyway)
Mac OSX "Snow Leopard" (new release, design seems solid enough though - still insufficient data.)
Linspire-tan (Old character, used to be famous, not sure if so still tho)


OS-Kuns
3.1-kun (Not sure if we need clarification on design here, check up)
95-kun (solid)
98-kun (needs more data)
98SE-kun (ditto)
ME-kun (solid i think)
2k-kun (solid)
Homeo (xp home, solid)
XP-kun (solid)
Mac OS9-kun (solid)
Mac OSX "Leopard"-kun (solid)
Mac OSX "Tiger"-kun (BIG TIGER, solid)
Damn Small Linux (I dunno about these two)
Oralux (no rly i dont)

Viruses/Malware
4K
Abraxas
A-Bomb
Acid
Acme
Mimail (aka, Rabbit.EXE)
MyDoom
Viru-tan
Acme-kun (?)
A-Bomb-kun(?)
Abraxas-kun (?)
Ah-kun
Cerberus-kun
Horror-kun

Questionmarked viru-kuns for duplicity, do you really need multiple versions of viru-tans? That seems redundant.

There you go, list get.

Added after 30 seconds:

I'm not a demon overlord for nothing you know -.-

Added after 1 minutes:

Also App-tans need consistency check before we go further into that.

You missed WE-tan, but as she's an enigma as a character we'll take her later.
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

Xi Wang chan

#248
October 17, 2009, 03:16:21 AM
Quote from: "GTCD"Objection your honor!

Using this technique, the user ofthe quiz could expect the results, which leads to inaccuracy. In addition, more questions must be made, thus boring the user.

I suggest more questions that specifies to certain, but not one, results.

oh no no!... I talking for technique as next ^^, mmm:

question 1: have the value for specific OS-tans
question 2: have the value for specific OS-tans (may be or not the same OS-tan that first question ^^)
question n...

then is: just the suitable questions and answers ^^ (and funny too, OK =w=?)... are you on right that one interminable quiz is bored ^^...

Added after 2 minutes:

Quote from: "GTCD"You are obviously don't know what I'm talking about.


Ok just for the hell of it.
Example:

Describe yourself:
A pervert
A hot chick
A cross-dressing human

See? We're killing two birds with one stone here lawl. With questions that give more choices means less questions, unexpecting (but precise) results.
But yes, we could usea few questions that specify to a person though.

Dun.

on this way ^^

Added after 2 minutes:

Quote from: "NejinOniwa"I'm not even bothering calculating the efficiency rate of that, since I know it'd be quite bothersome to set up; also, the downside of your "unexpectedness" is inaccuracy. If you just make the quiz long enough, you can achieve unexpectedness without losing accuracy.

(Then again, it's a quiz, not expecting some damn oracle here -w-)

yep, a good quiz requires the minimum necessary questions for the best result, no less (and no more too n_n')...

Added after 1 minutes:

Quote from: "NejinOniwa"THINK LOGICALLY
It makes perfect sense not to include EVERY single character in a quiz. All OS'es, in one, and then perhaps app-tans and viru/malware-tans in separate versions.

Cluttering = DO NOT WANT

a good idea ^^, more efficiency on results ^w^... and more test to solve and enjoy *w*...

Added after 3 minutes:

Quote from: "NejinOniwa"Oh, dear ME, what a challenge.

OS-tans, primary list
3.1-tan
NT-san (Big NT, Mama NT, etc)
Inu-T
95-tan
Hacchan (Win98)
Secchan (Win98SE)
ME-tan
2k-tan
XP-tan (XP Pro, "Saseko")
Homeko (XP Home)
Moseko (XPMCE)
Visbou (Ninja Vistan)
Vistake ("Screw" Vistan)
Generic OSX-tan
MacOS9-tan/Sonata
MacOS7.5-tan
Linux-tan (Aka Penguin girl)
OS/2-tan

OS-Tans, secondary list (Secondary -tans or -tans of unreleased os'es)
Komepo (XP Pro secondary OF AMERICA, not sure if we need YET ANOTHER XP-tan)
95 OSR 2.1-tan (System update, kinda like security packs these days, not sure if want)
95 OSR 2.5-tan (Same as above, don't even know the differences between these two)
Yamada (Win98 secondary)
97-tan (Pre-release Win98)
Odyssey-tan (Windows Odyssey, unreleased beta OS
Neptune-tan (Windows Neptune, beta)
Mac OSX "Tiger"-tan (insufficient data)
Mac OSX "Cheetah"-tan (insufficient data, and not sure if we need both of these anyway)
Mac OSX "Snow Leopard" (new release, design seems solid enough though - still insufficient data.)
Linspire-tan (Old character, used to be famous, not sure if so still tho)


OS-Kuns
3.1-kun (Not sure if we need clarification on design here, check up)
95-kun (solid)
98-kun (needs more data)
98SE-kun (ditto)
ME-kun (solid i think)
2k-kun (solid)
Homeo (xp home, solid)
XP-kun (solid)
Mac OS9-kun (solid)
Mac OSX "Leopard"-kun (solid)
Mac OSX "Tiger"-kun (BIG TIGER, solid)
Damn Small Linux (I dunno about these two)
Oralux (no rly i dont)

Viruses/Malware
4K
Abraxas
A-Bomb
Acid
Acme
Mimail (aka, Rabbit.EXE)
MyDoom
Viru-tan
Acme-kun (?)
A-Bomb-kun(?)
Abraxas-kun (?)
Ah-kun
Cerberus-kun
Horror-kun

Questionmarked viru-kuns for duplicity, do you really need multiple versions of viru-tans? That seems redundant.

There you go, list get.

Added after 30 seconds:

I'm not a demon overlord for nothing you know -.-

Added after 1 minutes:

Also App-tans need consistency check before we go further into that.

You missed WE-tan, but as she's an enigma as a character we'll take her later.

because are really a lot TwT...

mmm...

OS quiz (may be just one little large quiz oO?), Apps quiz, Malware/errors quiz...

GTCD

#249
October 17, 2009, 06:38:44 AM
So there will be more quizzes?
Which OS-tan are you?
Which App-tan are you?

etc...

Sounds pretty good. Let's do the OS-tan first.

errrr...
Do you eat a lot?
Do you work slowly?
Do you know what E=MC^2 means?

These questions = awesome ?

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#250
October 17, 2009, 08:54:14 AM
Hmm...somewhat too generic.

I more liek the "xxxxx situation, what do you do?" type of question. Gives more range on stuff. Y/N things just bore me ->-
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

Xi Wang chan

#251
October 18, 2009, 02:14:48 AM
mmm, good point, not just yes/no oO...

Sora

#252
October 18, 2009, 02:50:18 AM
Wow, I missed a lot.
Yeah, separating the Quizzes is good, XXXXX situation good.
So can we make the Quiz/zes now?
E 123 \'Omega\': Eggman detected. Begin annihilation sequence.
Miles \'Tails\' Prowler: No, Omega, Eggman is our friend!
E 123 \'Omega\': Small forest creature has gone mad. Suggest immediate termination.

GTCD

#253
October 19, 2009, 09:36:40 AM
Those looked like Y/N questions but I wanted to make different kind of answers. e.o

So errm.. yes let's start. What should be the first question? Hmmm....

How do you eat a popsicle? o_O I know there's a comic strip of it somewhere.

4 quizzes, 1 result, XP-tan, that\'s me. >:| Dawrn it.

NejinOniwa

#254
October 19, 2009, 10:43:56 AM
The overlord delivers.
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20
User actions